A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than HOK-amet Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. Test the researcher's claim using the summary statistics below. Assume that all conditions for testing have been met. Report the test statistic a the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. Round all values to three decimal places. Click the icon to view the summary statistics OA. t= -1.623; p=0.054; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OB. t= 1.623; p = 0.055, Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OC. t=1.623, p=0.108; Reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. O D. t= -1.623, p = 0.108; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. Summary statistics Athletic Women n=50 x=5.0 inches s=1.4 inches Non-Athletic Women CI n=30 x=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches - X
A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than HOK-amet Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. Test the researcher's claim using the summary statistics below. Assume that all conditions for testing have been met. Report the test statistic a the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. Round all values to three decimal places. Click the icon to view the summary statistics OA. t= -1.623; p=0.054; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OB. t= 1.623; p = 0.055, Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OC. t=1.623, p=0.108; Reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. O D. t= -1.623, p = 0.108; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. Summary statistics Athletic Women n=50 x=5.0 inches s=1.4 inches Non-Athletic Women CI n=30 x=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches - X
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.3: Measures Of Spread
Problem 1GP
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning