Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise Louise Don't confess Confess Louise gets 5 years Louise gets 2 years Don't confess Theima gets 5 years Theima gets 20 years Louise gets 15 years Louise gets 20 years Confess Theima gets 2 years Theima gets 15 years (Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise) Use Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise. Thelma and Louise are arrested and jailed for murder. Given the payoff matrix in the figure, the optimal (collusive) behavior for Thelma and Louise to minimize their joint sentence is for Thelma and for Louise O to confess; to confess. O not to confess; not to confess O to confess; not to confess. O not to confess; to confess Thelma

Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise Louise Don't confess Confess Louise gets 5 years Louise gets 2 years Don't confess Theima gets 5 years Theima gets 20 years Louise gets 15 years Louise gets 20 years Confess Theima gets 2 years Theima gets 15 years (Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise) Use Figure: Prisoners' Dilemma for Thelma and Louise. Thelma and Louise are arrested and jailed for murder. Given the payoff matrix in the figure, the optimal (collusive) behavior for Thelma and Louise to minimize their joint sentence is for Thelma and for Louise O to confess; to confess. O not to confess; not to confess O to confess; not to confess. O not to confess; to confess Thelma

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2) Veronica is going to sell two vases to a dealer. She can sell each vase for $10. In order to bring her vases to the dealer, Veronica needs to take a bus. There is a 50% chance that all the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip and a 50% chance that none of the vases carried on one bus trip will be broken during the trip. A roundtrip bus ticket costs $1. Veronica's net income is given by the revenues from the sale of her vases minus the cost of her bus trip(s). 2a) How many trips would Veronica make if she were risk-neutral? 2b) Suppose that Veronica's utility from income is u(w)=100ln(x+w), and that she has no wealth other than the vases (also allow her to have negative wealth as in when she takes two vases on the same trip and both break while she paid the fare). What is the expected utility of net income when Veronica takes both vases on one bus trip? And when she makes two trips? What strategy is preferred? 2c) Would Veronica's preferred strategy change if…
Ivan the trainer has two solo workout plans that he offers to us clients: plan a and Plan B. Each client does either one or the other (not both). On Friday there were 3 clients who did plan A and 5 who did Plan B. On Saturday they were 6 clients who did plan A and 2 who did Plan B. I've been trained his Friday clients for a total of 10 hours and his Saturday clients for a total of 10 hours. How long does each of the workout plans last? length of each plan a workout: Hours length of each Plan B work out: Hours
You and your roomate are deciding whether to go to a party or not on Friday. Going to the party is fun and gives a benefit of 4. If you go to the party, there is a 50% chance you will get covid. If you do not attend the party but your roommate does and gets covid, there is 80% chance that you will get covid. The impact of getting covid is -10. If both of you stay home, you will not be exposed to covid and will not have fun, leading to a payoff of 0 for both of you. 3. Construct a game matrix based on the description above and find any (c) Nash equilibria. How would your answer change if one roomate was less social and enjoyed (d) partying less than the other? Change the payoff matrix in a way that is both consistent with one roommate being less social than the other and changes the prediction you found in (a). (Note: if you found multiple possible equilibria in (a), changing the outcome could mean either making one of your prior Nash equilbria the only Nash equilibrium or making an…
If a risk‐averse individual owns a home worth $100,000, and that individual iswilling to pay a maximum of $1,000 for an annual fire insurance policy that covers theentire loss in the event of a fire, then we know that:A. There is a one percent chance that the home will be destroyed by fire inthe next yearB. There is a greater than a one percent chance that the home will bedestroyed by fire in the next yearC. There is less than a one percent chance that the home will be destroyedby fire in the next yearD. None of the above is correct
Suppose that the University of Alabama and Clemson are making spending decisions for theupcoming year. Assume that Alabama is currently spending $15 million on their recruiting andfacilities, and Clemson is spending $10 million. Each team has an additional $5 million to spendor keep as profits. If they both choose to not spend the additional $5 million then Alabama hasa 60% chance of getting the highest quality quarterback recruit to commit to them (getting thecommitment of the player is the goal). However, if they both choose to spend the additional $5million then there is a 57% chance that Alabama gets the high quality quarterback to commit. IfAlabama spends the additional $5 million but Clemson doesn’t then there is a 67% chanceAlabama gets the recruit. However, if Alabama does NOT spend the additional $5million butClemson does then there is a 50% change either team gets the recruit’s commitment. Setup thepayoff matrix and label the players, their strategies, and their payoffs, and…
Suppose, unfortunately, your mathematics andeconomics professors have decided to give teststwo days from now and you can spend a total ofonly twelve hours studying for both exams. Aftersome thought, you conclude that dividing yourstudy time equally between each subject will giveyou an expected grade of C in each course. Foreach additional three hours of study time for oneof the subjects, your grade will increase one letterfor that subject, and your grade will fall oneletter for the other subject.48 PART 1 • Introduction to EconomicsCopyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.a.…
If a risk-neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know 15. that: a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover. b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover. c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover. d) None of the above are correct. e) All of the above are correct.
2 Scenario Your client, InsureCorp, is an insurance company considering launching an 'income insur- ance' product in the nation of Motherland. Income insurance is a product that fully insures a household against changes in income caused by a major injury or illness. At present, no businesses are selling income insurance products in Motherland. Initial market research suggests that there are 15,000 households in Motherland interested in purchasing income insurance. Your client expects that the fixed cost of launching the income insurance product will be $25,000,000 per year, and that each policy issued to a customer will cost the company an additional $2,000 in sales commissions. 2.1 Your task Your client wants you to analyse the potential market for income insurance and report on the following: What is the maximum price the company can charge a household for an income insurance policy? What is the expected profit (or loss) for the company if it becomes a monopoly provider of income…
[Adverse Selection] Each of the two players receives an envelope, in which there is anamount of money that is equally distributed from $0, $1, $2, ..., $100. The amounts in twoenvelopes are independent. After receiving the envelope, each individual can check exactlyhow much money is put in his/her own envelope. Then each player has the option to exchangehis/her envelope for the other individual's prize. The decisions are made simultaneously. Ifboth individuals agree to exchange, then the envelopes are exchanged; otherwise, if at leastone player chooses not to exchange, each individual keeps his/her own envelope and receivesits attached sum of money.a. Model this game as a static Bayesian game (write the normal formrepresentation) and find the Bayesian Nash equilibrium.b. Consider a new game where the probability distribution of money in eachenvelope is changed. The amount is equal to $100 with probability 90%, and is equalto each number in $0, $1, $2, ... ,$99 with probability 0.1%.…
Edwina, a commodities broker, has acquired an option tobuy 1,000 oz of gold at $50/oz. If she takes the option and ifCongress relaxes import quotas, she can sell the gold for$80/oz. If she takes the option and Congress does not relaxthe import quotas, however, the company will lose $10/oz. Edwina believes that there is a 50% chance that the governmentwill relax the quota. She also has the option of waiting untilCongress decides whether to relax the import quota. If sheadopts this strategy, however, there is a 70% chance that someother broker will have already taken the option.a If Edwina is risk-neutral, what should she do? b If Edwina’s utility function for a change x in her as-set position is given by u(x) (10,000 x)1/2, what should she do?
4. Marvin is given a number of choices between various lotteries where the possible outcomes include a vacation, a motorbike, a pair of shoes and a round of applause, or X = {v,m, s, a}. It is known that, according to Marvin's preferences, v > m > s > a. In addition, he claims he would be indifferent between the motorbike and a lottery that results in a vacation with probability 0.4 and a pair of shoes with probability 0.6, and he would furthermore be indifferent between a pair of shoes and a lottery that results in a motorbike with probability 0.5 and a round of applause with probability 0.5. Marvin has a utility function u: X → R (in other words u maps each element in X to a real number) and he in an expected utility maximiser (in other words his preferences conform to the axioms G1 to G6). 4.1. Assuming Marvin's claims about indifference are correct, derive u(m) and u(s) in terms of u(v) and u(a). 4.2. Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions are only unique up to positive affine…
2. Christiaan can go hiking, or he can stay at home. Hiking would be fun if nothing bad happens, but there is a risk if he goes hiking that he will meet a bear (not fun) or get bitten by a snake (very not fun). Christiaan decides that if there is a 5% chance of meeting a bear and a 1% chance of getting bitten by a snake, he would prefer to go hiking rather than stay at home. However, if the chance of meeting a bear is 10% and the chance of a snake bite is 5%, he definitely would rather stay at home. then (a) Consider the utility function: U (stay home) = 25, U (hike no event) = 100, U (hike & snake) -1000, U (hike & bear) = -200. Does this utility function represent Christiaan's pref- erences? Explain. (b) Suppose that the utility function in (a) does represent Christiaan's preferences. Would Christiaan prefer to hike or stay home if the probability of meeting a bear is 6% and the probability of being bitten by a snake is 4%? Show your work.