Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1) Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next; Coefficient of Variation 0 -0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 Year 1 Inflow. $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. Adjustment Factor 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 2 3 4 5 Year 1 2 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 a. Fill in the table below: Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1) Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next; Coefficient of Variation 0 -0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 Year 1 Inflow. $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. Adjustment Factor 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 2 3 4 5 Year 1 2 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 a. Fill in the table below: Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Chapter15: Capital Structure Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 12SP
Related questions
Question
Vaibhav
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you