The Hull Petroleum Company and Inverted V are retail gasoline franchises that compete in a local market to sell gasoline to consumers. Hull and Inverted Vare located across the street from each other and can observe the prices posted on eact other's marquees. Demand for gasoline in this market is Q = 60 - 10P, and both franchises obtain gasoline from their supplier at $2.80 per gallon. On the day that both franchises opened for business, each owner was observed changing the price gasoline advertised on its marquee more than 10 times; the owner of Hull lowered its price to slightly undercut Inverted V's price, and the owner of Inverted V lowered its advertised price to beat Hull's price. Since then, prices appear to have stabilized. Under current conditions: a) how many gallons of gasoline are sold in the market? b) at what price?

The Hull Petroleum Company and Inverted V are retail gasoline franchises that compete in a local market to sell gasoline to consumers. Hull and Inverted Vare located across the street from each other and can observe the prices posted on eact other's marquees. Demand for gasoline in this market is Q = 60 - 10P, and both franchises obtain gasoline from their supplier at $2.80 per gallon. On the day that both franchises opened for business, each owner was observed changing the price gasoline advertised on its marquee more than 10 times; the owner of Hull lowered its price to slightly undercut Inverted V's price, and the owner of Inverted V lowered its advertised price to beat Hull's price. Since then, prices appear to have stabilized. Under current conditions: a) how many gallons of gasoline are sold in the market? b) at what price?

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

. When Chinese automakers began exporting cars, rather thanfocusing on developed nations in the West, they shippedautos to emerging markets in countries such as Algeria, Russia,Chile, and South Africa. In these markets, even used vehiclesfrom multinational manufacturers are relatively scarce—andrelatively expensive. The Chinese automakers, who prioritizelow cost rather than design or even safety, applied a penetration-pricing strategy. A woman in Santiago, Chile, who boughta new Chery S21 explained, “The price factor is fairly decisive.I paid $5,500 new and full. Toyota with similar features costsaround $12,000.” Why do you think Chinese automakerschose that pricing strategy? Do you think it was successful?As Chinese regulators pressure these manufacturers to maketheir cars safer, do you think they will be able to keep theirprices low compared with those of the international automakers? Why or why not?26
While there is a degree of differentiation between major grocery chains like Albertsons and Kroger, theregular offering of sale prices by both firms for many of their products provides evidence that these firmsengage in price competition. For markets where Albertsons and Kroger are the dominant grocers, thissuggests that these two stores simultaneously announce one of two prices for a given product: a regularprice or a sale price. Suppose that when one firm announces the sale price and the other announces theregular price for a particular product, the firm announcing the sale price attracts 1000 extra customers toearn a profit of $5000, compared to the $3000 earned by the firm announcing the regular price. Whenboth firms announced the sale price, the two firms split the market equally (each getting an extra 500customers) to earn profits of $2000 each. When both firms announced the regular price, each companyattracts only its 1500 loyal customers and the firms each earned $4500 in…
16:04 AM • ll l 16%! eclass.uonbi.ac.ke/mod/qu 2 If a duopolist has a linear demand curve of the form Q=400 – P. Assuming each firm has total cost (TC=3000+100Q). Calculate the profit- maximizing price-quantity combinations using the following four oligopoly pricing models listed below demonstrating that: а. Under the Cournot model, both firms will earn same level of profit and determine industry profit and explain why this is would be the case. b. Under the Cartel model each firm earns a higher profit than under Cournot. Under the Quasi-competitive model, the firm will make a loss equivalent to fixed cost. С. d. Under the Stackelberg's model the leader will earn more than twice the profit of the follower and that total industry profits will be lower than under both Cournot and Cartel models. Explain why this is would be the case. I + II II !!!
There are two firms in the market (duopoly). These two firms are competingsimultaneously. The first firm chooses its output level (x) by predicting the second firm’soutput (y). Let c denote the total cost function c(x) = x and c(y) = y. Also, let’s assumethat the inverse demand function is p(Y) = 7 - Y where Y = x + y. (1) Obtain the reactionfunction of the first firm. (2) Find the equilibrium (output and profit of each firm) whentwo firms simultaneously compete
Two firms produce identical products at zero cost, and theycompete by setting prices. If each firm charges a low price,then both firms earn profits of zero. If each firm charges ahigh price, then each firm earns profits of £30. If one firmcharges a high price and the other firm charges a low price,the firm that charges the lower price earns profits of £50, andthe firm charging the higher price earns profits of zero. (a) Which oligopoly model best describes this situation?(b) Write this game in normal form.(c) Suppose the game is infinitely repeated. Can theplayers sustain the "collusive outcome" as a Nashequilibrium if the interest rate is 50 percent? Explain. Please answer the a, b and c parts.
Save Answer Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies spit the market and earn $60 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $20 million since each company must bear the cost of advertisirlg. Yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $70 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers? Neither company will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $60. One company will advertise, the other will not. Brown Inc. earns $70. Both companies will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $40. Both companies will advertise, and PM Inc. earns $60.
Discuss Many electronics stores like EMAX, and Jumbo have low-price guaranteepolicies. At a minimum, these guarantees promise to match a rival’s price, and somepromise to beat the lowest advertised price by a given percentage. Do these types ofpricing strategies result in cutthroat competition and zero economic profits? If not, whynot? If so, suggest an alternative pricing strategy that will permit these firms to earnpositive economic profits.
QUESTION 4 If Bertrand duopolists respectively have marginal costs of 10 (firm 1) and 8 (firm 2), which of the prices below can arise in Nash equilibrium? (Assume that prices must be quoted in full cents, e.g. $0.99 or $1, but $0.995 is not possible. If prices are equal, half of the customers buy from each firm.) O Both firms charge $8.01. Firm 1 charges $10 and firm 2 charges $8. Both firms charge $9. Firm 1 charges $10 and firm 2 charges $9.99.
In 2006, the five leading suppliers of digital cameras in the United States were Canon,Sony, Kodak, Olympus, and Samsung. The combined market share of these five firmswas 60.9 percent. The leading firm was Canon, with a market share of 18.7 percent. Theown price elasticity for Canon’s cameras was –4.0 and the market elasticity of demandwas –1.6. Suppose that in 2006, the average retail price of a Canon digital camera was$240 and that Canon’s marginal cost was $180 per camera. Suppose you were the CEO of Kodak, what would you do to avoid its business failure? Please apply the specific tools from managerial economics to the case analysis
In 2006, the five leading suppliers of digital cameras in the United States were Canon,Sony, Kodak, Olympus, and Samsung. The combined market share of these five firmswas 60.9 percent. The leading firm was Canon, with a market share of 18.7 percent. Theown price elasticity for Canon’s cameras was –4.0 and the market elasticity of demandwas –1.6. Suppose that in 2006, the average retail price of a Canon digital camera was$240 and that Canon’s marginal cost was $180 per camera.1. Based on the above information, discuss industry concentration, demand and market conditions, and the pricing behavior of Canon in 2006 and explain how the industry environment significantly influence the performance of the digital camera firms.2. Suppose you were the CEO of Kodak, what would you do to avoid its business failure? Please apply the specific tools from managerial economics to the case analys
Refer to the table below to answer the following questions. Table 14.2.10 Fim A Comply A: Sim Cheat A $1 Sm Comply B Sim B-S05m Firm B A:-50.5m A0 Cheat B $15m B:0 Refer to Table 14.2.10. Firm A and Firm B are the only producers of soap powder. They collude and agree to share the market equally. The equilibrium a dominant strategy equilibrium because the strategy in this game is for a firm Select one O A is to comply regardless of the other firm's choice O B.is to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies O Cis not to comply when the other firm complies and to cheat when the other firm cheats OD. is to cheat regardless of the other firm's choice OEis not to comply when the other firm cheats and to cheat when the other firm complies 219 PM
Y5 The new food delivery company DoorDash is thinking of entering New Zealand. Its rivalry is the existing UBER Eats. Both these companies simultaneously choose whether to operate in January, February, March, or April, or not to operate at all. Thus the strategy set for both these companies is {January, February, March, April, or Not to Operate}. Assume that the profit received by a monopolist in month m (where a monopoly means only one company is operating) is 10 x m – 15, whereas each duopolist (so both are operating) would earn 4 x m – 15. A company makes zero profit for any month that is not operating. Also, the value of m while calculating the profits for a particular month in the above equations is as follows {January = 1, February = 2, March = 3, April = 4}. The payoffs of the strategic form of this game are the sum of the profit of all the months. For example, if DoorDash operates in February and UBER Eats in March, then DoorDash earns zero profit in January; 5 (=10 x 2 - 15)…