Principles of Cost Accounting
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781305087408
Author: Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 8, Problem 13E
Using
Last year, Wrigley Corp. adopted a
On June 30, the end of the current fiscal year, a partial
Standards set at the beginning of the year have remained unchanged. All inventories are priced at standard cost. What conclusions can be drawn from each of the four variances shown in Wrigley’s trial balance?
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Quality
Company uses a standard cost system and reports the following information for
2024:
1(Click
the icon to view the information.)
Quality
Company reported the following variances:
2(Click
the icon to view the variances.)
Quality
produced
1,000
units of finished product in
2024.
Read the
requirements3.
Begin by journalizing the purchase of direct materials on account, including the related variance. (Prepare a single compound journal entry.)
Date
Accounts and Explanation
Debit
Credit
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Now, journalize the usage of direct materials, including the related variance. (Prepare a single compound journal entry.)
Date
Accounts and Explanation
Debit
Credit
(6)
(7)
(8)…
[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.]
The director of cost management for Odessa Company uses a statistical control chart to help management determine
when to investigate variances. The critical value is 1 standard deviation. The company incurred the following direct-labor
efficiency variances during the first six months of the current year.
January
February
March.
April
May
June
$ 250 F
800 U
700 U
908 U
1,050 U
1,200 U
The standard direct-labor cost during each of these months was $19,000. The controller has estimated that the firm's
monthly direct-labor variances have a standard deviation of $950.
Required:
1-a. Draw a statistical control chart and plot the variance data given above.
1-b. Which variances will be investigated?
Butrico Manufacturing Corporation uses a standard cost system, records materials price variances when direct materials are
purchased, and prorates all variances at year-end. Variances associated with direct materials are prorated based on the balances of
direct materials in the appropriate accounts, and variances associated with direct labor and manufacturing overhead are prorated to
Finished Goods Inventory and to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) on the basis of the relative direct labor cost in these accounts at year-
end.
The following information is for the year ended December 31:
The company had no beginning inventories and no ending Work-in-Process (WIP) Inventory. It applies manufacturing overhead at 80%
of standard direct labor cost.
Finished goods inventory at 12/31:
Direct materials
Direct labor
Applied manufacturing overhead
Direct materials inventory at 12/31
Cost of goods sold for the year ended 12/31:
Direct materials
Direct labor
Applied manufacturing overhead
Direct materials…
Chapter 8 Solutions
Principles of Cost Accounting
Ch. 8 - How does a standard cost accounting system work,...Ch. 8 - What is the difference between the standard cost...Ch. 8 - Prob. 3QCh. 8 - What are the specific procedures on which a...Ch. 8 - How are standards for materials and labor costs...Ch. 8 - What is a variance?Ch. 8 - How do price and quantity variances relate to...Ch. 8 - How do rate and efficiency variances relate to...Ch. 8 - Prob. 9QCh. 8 - How does a materials purchase price variance...
Ch. 8 - Prob. 11QCh. 8 - Prob. 12QCh. 8 - When a company uses a standard cost system, are...Ch. 8 - What two factors must be considered when breaking...Ch. 8 - What might cause the following materials...Ch. 8 - What might cause the following labor variances?
An...Ch. 8 - Prob. 17QCh. 8 - Prob. 18QCh. 8 - Prob. 19QCh. 8 - Prob. 20QCh. 8 - When does a flexible-budget variance occur?
Ch. 8 - Why is it important to determine flexible-budget...Ch. 8 - Prob. 23QCh. 8 - What is the significance of a production-volume...Ch. 8 - If production is more or less than the standard...Ch. 8 - At the end of the current fiscal year, the trial...Ch. 8 - What variances from the four-variance method are...Ch. 8 - What is the primary difference between the...Ch. 8 - What are the four variances in the four-variance...Ch. 8 - In all of the exercises involving variances, use F...Ch. 8 - Prob. 2ECh. 8 - Prob. 3ECh. 8 - Prob. 4ECh. 8 - Prob. 5ECh. 8 - Computing materials variances D-List Calendar Co....Ch. 8 - Computing labor variances LIFT Inc. manufactures...Ch. 8 - Standard cost summary; materials and labor cost...Ch. 8 - Computing labor variances Fill in the missing...Ch. 8 - Standard unit cost and journal entries The normal...Ch. 8 - Making journal entries Assume that during the...Ch. 8 - Using variance analysis and interpretation Last...Ch. 8 - Using variance analysis and interpretation Last...Ch. 8 - Journalizing standard costs in two departments...Ch. 8 - Calculating factory overhead The standard capacity...Ch. 8 - Determining Budgeted Overhead The overhead...Ch. 8 - Calculating factory overhead: two variances Munoz...Ch. 8 - Calculating factory overhead: two variances...Ch. 8 - The normal capacity of a manufacturing plant is...Ch. 8 - Calculating amount of factory overhead applied to...Ch. 8 - Georgia Gasket Co. budgets 8,000 direct labor...Ch. 8 - (Appendix) Calculating factory overhead: four...Ch. 8 - (Appendix) Calculating factory overhead: three...Ch. 8 - Materials and labor variances Branca Inspections...Ch. 8 - Materials and labor variances Fausto Fabricators...Ch. 8 - Zippy Inc. manufactures a fuel additive, Surge,...Ch. 8 - Calculation of materials and labor variances
Fritz...Ch. 8 - High-End Products Inc. uses a standard cost system...Ch. 8 - RDI Products Co. manufactures a variety of...Ch. 8 - The standard cost summary for the most popular...Ch. 8 - Carlo Lee Corp. has established the following...Ch. 8 - USD Inc. has established the following standard...Ch. 8 - Allocation of variances
Costa Brava Manufacturing...Ch. 8 - On May 1, Athens Inc. began the manufacture of a...Ch. 8 - The standard specifications for an electric motor...Ch. 8 - Cardiff Inc. manufactures men’s sport shirts for...Ch. 8 - Fargo Co. manufactures products in batches of 100...Ch. 8 - Prob. 15PCh. 8 - (Appendix) Overhead variances—four variance
Mobile...Ch. 8 - Shinto Corp. uses a standard cost system and...Ch. 8 - Kamen Manufacturing Co. estimates the following...Ch. 8 - Prob. 19PCh. 8 - Jillian Manufacturing Inc. manufactures a single...Ch. 8 - Cost and production data for Binghamton Beverages...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Using variance analysis and interpretation Last year, Endicott Corp. adopted a standard cost system. Labor standards were set on the basis of time studies and prevailing wage rates. Materials standards were determined from materials specifications and the prices then in effect. On June 30, the end of the current fiscal year, a partial trial balance revealed the following: Standards set at the beginning of the year have remained unchanged. All inventories are priced at standard cost. What conclusions can be drawn from each of the four variances shown in Endicotts trial balance?arrow_forwardWarner Company has the following data for the past year: Warner uses the overhead control account to accumulate both actual and applied overhead. Required: 1. Calculate the overhead variance for the year and close it to cost of goods sold. 2. Assume the variance calculated is material. After prorating, close the variances to the appropriate accounts and provide the final ending balances of these accounts. 3. What if the variance is of the opposite sign calculated in Requirement 1? Provide the appropriate adjusting journal entries for Requirements 1 and 2.arrow_forwardAs part of its cost control program, Tracer Company uses a standard costing system for all manufactured items. The standard cost for each item is established at the beginning of the fiscal year, and the standards are not revised until the beginning of the next fiscal year. Changes in costs, caused during the year by changes in direct materials or direct labor inputs or by changes in the manufacturing process, are recognized as they occur by the inclusion of planned variances in Tracers monthly operating budgets. The following direct labor standard was established for one of Tracers products, effective June 1, 2012, the beginning of the fiscal year: The standard was based on the direct labor being performed by a team consisting of five persons with Assembler A skills, three persons with Assembler B skills, and two persons with machinist skills; this team represents the most efficient use of the companys skilled employees. The standard also assumed that the quality of direct materials that had been used in prior years would be available for the coming year. For the first seven months of the fiscal year, actual manufacturing costs at Tracer have been within the standards established. However, the company has received a significant increase in orders, and there is an insufficient number of skilled workers to meet the increased production. Therefore, beginning in January, the production teams will consist of eight persons with Assembler A skills, one person with Assembler B skills, and one person with machinist skills. The reorganized teams will work more slowly than the normal teams, and as a result, only 80 units will be produced in the same time period in which 100 units would normally be produced. Faulty work has never been a cause for units to be rejected in the final inspection process, and it is not expected to be a cause for rejection with the reorganized teams. Furthermore, Tracer has been notified by its direct materials supplier that lower-quality direct materials will be supplied beginning January 1. Normally, one unit of direct materials is required for each good unit produced, and no units are lost due to defective direct materials. Tracer estimates that 6 percent of the units manufactured after January 1 will be rejected in the final inspection process due to defective direct materials. Required: 1. Determine the number of units of lower quality direct materials that Tracer Company must enter into production in order to produce 47,000 good finished units. 2. How many hours of each class of direct labor must be used to manufacture 47,000 good finished units? 3. Determine the amount that should be included in Tracers January operating budget for the planned direct labor variance caused by the reorganization of the direct labor teams and the lower quality direct materials. (CMA adapted)arrow_forward
- Yohan Company has the following balances in its direct materials and direct labor variance accounts at year-end: Unadjusted Cost of Goods Sold equals 1,500,000, unadjusted Work in Process equals 236,000, and unadjusted Finished Goods equals 180,000. Required: 1. Assume that the ending balances in the variance accounts are immaterial and prepare the journal entries to close them to Cost of Goods Sold. What is the adjusted balance in Cost of Goods Sold after closing out the variances? 2. What if any ending balance in a variance account that exceeds 10,000 is considered material? Close the immaterial variance accounts to Cost of Goods Sold and prorate the material variances among Cost of Goods Sold, Work in Process, and Finished Goods on the basis of prime costs in these accounts. The prime cost in Cost of Goods Sold is 1,050,000, the prime cost in Work in Process is 165,200, and the prime cost in Finished Goods is 126,000. What are the adjusted balances in Work in Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold after closing out all variances? (Round ratios to four significant digits. Round journal entries to the nearest dollar.)arrow_forwardAnker Company had the data below for its most recent year, ended December 31: Required: Prepare a performance report that shows the variances on an item-by-item basis.arrow_forwardPotter Company has installed a JIT purchasing and manufacturing system and is using back-flush accounting for its cost flows. It currently uses a two-trigger approach with the purchase of materials as the first trigger point and the completion of goods as the second trigger point. During the month of June, Potter had the following transactions: There were no beginning or ending inventories. All goods produced were sold with a 60 percent markup. Any variance is closed to Cost of Goods Sold. (Variances are recognized monthly.) Required: 1. Prepare the journal entries that would have been made using a traditional accounting approach for cost flows. 2. Prepare the journal entries for the month using backflush costing.arrow_forward
- Potter Company has installed a JIT purchasing and manufacturing system and is using back-flush accounting for its cost flows. It currently uses a two-trigger approach with the purchase of materials as the first trigger point and the completion of goods as the second trigger point. During the month of June, Potter had the following transactions: There were no beginning or ending inventories. All goods produced were sold with a 60 percent markup. Any variance is closed to Cost of Goods Sold. (Variances are recognized monthly.) Required: 1. Prepare the journal entries for the month of May using backflush costing, assuming that Potter uses the completion of goods as the only trigger point. 2. Prepare the journal entries for the month of May using backflush costing, assuming that Potter uses the sale of goods as the only trigger point.arrow_forwardEthics in Action In August, Lannister Company introduced a new performance measurement system in manufacturing operations. One of the new performance measures is lead time, which is determined by tagging a random sample of items with a log sheet throughout the month. The log sheets recorded the time that the sample items started production and the time that they ended production, as well as all steps in between. At the end of the month, the controller collected the log sheets and computed the average lead time of the tagged products. This number was reported to central management and was used to evaluate the performance of the plant manager. Because of the poor lead time results reported for August, the plant was under extreme pressure to reduce lead time in September. The following memo was intercepted by the controller. Date: September 3 To: Hourly Employees From: Plant Manager During last month, you may have noticed that some of the products were tagged with a log sheet. This sheet records the time that a product enters production and the time that it leaves production. The difference between these two times is termed the lead time. Our plant is evaluated on improving lead time. From now on, I ask all of you to keep an eye out for the tagged items. When you see a tagged item, it is to receive special attention. Work on that item first, and then immediately move it to the next operation. Under no circumstances should tagged items wait on any other work that you have. Naturally, report accurate information. I insist that you record the correct times on the log sheet as the product goes through your operations. How should the controller respond to this discovery?arrow_forwardMadison Company uses the following rule to determine whether direct labor efficiency variances ought to be investigated. A direct labor efficiency variance will be investigated anytime the amount exceeds the lesser of 12,000 or 10 percent of the standard labor cost. Reports for the past five weeks provided the following information: Required: 1. Using the rule provided, identify the cases that will be investigated. 2. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance is the use of lower quality direct materials than are usually used. Who is responsible? What corrective action would likely be taken? 3. Suppose that investigation reveals that the cause of a significant favorable direct labor efficiency variance is attributable to a new approach to manufacturing that takes less labor time but causes more direct materials waste. Upon examining the direct materials usage variance, it is discovered to be unfavorable, and it is larger than the favorable direct labor efficiency variance. Who is responsible? What action should be taken? How would your answer change if the unfavorable variance were smaller than the favorable?arrow_forward
- As part of its cost control program, Tracer Companyuses a standard costing system for all manufactureditems. The standard cost for each item is established atthe beginning of the fiscal year, and the standards are not revised until thebeginning of the next fiscal year. Changes in costs, caused during the year bychanges in direct materials or direct labor inputs or by changes in themanufacturing process, are recognized as they occur by the inclusion ofplanned variances in Tracer's monthly operating budgets.The following direct labor standard was established for one of Tracer'sproducts, effective June 1, 2012, the beginning of the fiscal year: Assembler A labor (5 hrs @ $10) $50 Assembler B labor (3 hrs @$11) 33 Machinist labor (2 hrs @$15) 30 Standard cost per 100 units $113 The standard was based on the direct labor being performed by a teamconsisting of five persons with Assembler A skills, three persons withAssembler B skills, and two persons with machinist skills; this team…arrow_forwardButrico Manufacturing Corporation uses a standard cost system, records materials price variances when direct materials are purchased, and prorates all variances at year-end. Variances associated with direct materials are prorated based on the balances of direct materials in the appropriate accounts, and variances associated with direct labor and manufacturing overhead are prorated to Finished Goods Inventory and to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) on the basis of the relative direct labor cost in these accounts at year- end. The following information is for the year ended December 31: The company had no beginning inventories and no ending Work-in-Process (WIP) Inventory. It applies manufacturing overhead at 80% of standard direct labor cost. Finished goods inventory at 12/31: Direct materials Direct labor Applied manufacturing overhead Direct materials inventory at 12/31 Cost of goods sold for the year ended 12/31: Direct materials Direct labor Applied manufacturing overhead Direct materials…arrow_forwardButrico Manufacturing Corporation uses a standard cost system, records materials price variances when direct materials are purchased, and prorates all variances at year-end. Variances associated with direct materials are prorated based on the balances of direct materials in the appropriate accounts, and variances associated with direct labor and manufacturing overhead are prorated to Finished Goods Inventory and to Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) on the basis of the relative direct labor cost in these accounts at year-end. The following information is for the year ended December 31: The company had no beginning inventories and no ending Work-in-Process (WIP) Inventory. It applies manufacturing overhead at 80% of standard direct labor cost. Finished goods inventory at 12/31: Direct materials Direct labor Applied manufacturing overhead Direct materials inventory at 12/31 Cost of goods sold for the year ended 12/31: Direct materials Direct labor Applied manufacturing overhead Direct materials…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Cost AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305087408Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. MitchellPublisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Cost Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781305087408
Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
What is Risk Management? | Risk Management process; Author: Educationleaves;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP-E75FGFkU;License: Standard youtube license